DentalCare Logo

Alveolar Ridge Preservation and Augmentation for Optimal Implant Placement

Course Number: 626

Additive Techniques

These involve addition of bone outside the existing native bone envelope. Common examples of additive techniques include:

  1. Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR)

  2. GBR with Particulate Graft

  3. Block Bone Grafts

GBR involves the incorporation of barrier membranes in the treatment of alveolar ridge defects. The membrane separates the bone defect from the overlying soft tissue. This allows the defect space to be repopulated with new blood vessels and osteogenic cells, which differentiate to form osteoblasts and are responsible for forming new bone. Desirable properties of membranes include biocompatibility, cell-occlusion properties, space-maintaining capability, ease of manipulation, and minimal susceptibility to complications.26

Table 2 details the various types of membranes available as well as their advantages and disadvantages.

Table 2.

Non ResorbableResorbable
e-PTFE (Expanded polytetrafluorethylene)
d-PTFE (Dense polytetrafluorethylene)
Titanium Foil
Micro titanium mesh
Native collagen
Cross-linked collagen
Freeze-dried fascia lata
Freeze-dried dura mater
Polyactic acid
Polyglycolic acid
Polyactic acid/Polyglycolic acid copolymers
Advantages• Good mechanical stability

• Excellent biocompatibility

• Rigidity is suitable for space maintenance, wound stability, and successful bone regeneration

• Plasticity, allows for bending, contouring and adaptation to any defect morphology
• Decreased patient morbidity

• No need for second surgery to remove membrane

• Lower rate of exposure

• Simplified surgical procedure

• Has hydrophilic properties which allows it to adhere to bone well once saturated with blood
Disadvantages• Good mechanical stability

• Excellent biocompatibility

• Rigidity is suitable for space maintenance, wound stability, and successful bone regeneration

• Plasticity, allows for bending, contouring and adaptation to any defect morphology
• Uncontrolled duration of barrier function

• Need for tenting screws to avoid collapse

• Micromovement of membrane leads to movement of graft material and disruption of blood clot

Adapted from Benic et al, Periodontology; 200026 and Soldatos et al, Quintessence International; 2016.28

Both resorbable and non-resorbable membranes have shown to facilitate adequate bone gain in minimal to moderate sized horizontal defects. However, the rigidity of non-resorbable membranes becomes beneficial when one desires vertical augmentation or when significant horizontal gain is needed in non-contained edentulous ridges. Animal 29 and human30 studies have shown an average vertical gain of 1.82 mm and 2.2 mm, respectively, with the sole use of non-resorbable e-PTFE membrane. The supplemental use of bone grafting materials along with membranes, can significantly increase the amount of bone gained following augmentation.31

GBR with Particulate Graft involves addition of particulate grafting material to assist with bone formation in GBR procedures. These grafts serve as space maintainers to prevent the membrane from collapsing or act as a scaffold, and/or stimulate bone growth. Based on their functional properties, they can be classified as osteogenic, osteoconductive or osteoinductive in nature.32 Osteogenic grafts allow formation of new bone from living cells that are transplanted within the graft. Osteoconductive grafts assist in the formation of a 3D scaffold which allows cells to migrate for ingrowth of blood vessels and osteoprogenitor cells. Osteoinductive grafts help recruitment of osteoprogenitor cells which are the precursors to osteoblasts, thus resulting in de-novo bone formation.

The origin, examples, and properties of the particulate grafts are detailed in the Table 3.

Table 3.

Type of GraftOriginExampleProperties
AutograftPatient's own tissueIntra-orally harvested from jaw, or extra-orally from iliac crest, tibia, calvaria, fibulaOsteogenic
AllograftTissues from individuals of same speciesFresh-frozen bone, freeze-dried bone, demineralized freeze-dried bone from cadaverMay have osteoinductive potential
XenograftTissue from another speciesBovine, porcine, equine bone mineralOsteoconductive
AlloplastSynthetically producedTricalcium phosphate, hydroxyapatite, calcium phosphate cement, calcium bioactive glass, polymersOsteoconductive

Adapted from Benic et al, Periodontology; 2000.26

GBR with particulate graft can be used to graft horizontal defects or vertical defects or combination defects requiring bone gain in multiple dimensions. Systematic review and meta-analysis by Sanz et al,33 showed superior bone width gain of 5.68 mm with a combination of particulate xenograft, particulate autogenous graft and bio-absorbable membrane.33 A vertical bone height gain of as high as 8 mm has been documented when e-PTFE membranes when used with particulate grafts.31 These combination techniques can be used not only during staged approaches but also simultaneously during implant placement when there are Class I, II, III defects (as explained in Table 1). The fact that this technique can be used in multiple case scenarios and is, unlike autogenous grafts, not limited by donor site anatomy, makes it fairly popular among clinicians.

Figure 2.

Additive Techniques - Figure 1
Additive Techniques - Figure 2
Additive Techniques - Figure 3

Figure 2.

Autogenous Block Bone Grafts are surgically harvested from another site within the same patient. Autogenous block bone grafts are indicated when a staged approach for implant placement is being used in Class 4 defects (Table 1). Autogenous grafts have remained the gold standard for several years and have proven to increase bone volume and quality prior to implant placement.34 However, disadvantages include higher morbidity, inadequate bone volume attainable depending on the defect size and the donor site anatomy. Extra oral donor sites for block bone grafts include iliac crest, tibia or calvaria. More commonly the blocks are harvested intra-orally from the mandibular ramus or the symphysis (the chin).34

When harvesting, it is important to be wary of the nerves and vessels that span this area to avoid alteration of neural sensation and life-threatening hemorrhagic complications.34 Once harvested, the blocks are fixated to the underlying native bone, in the edentulous recipient site, using screws ensuring intimate contact.32,34 A healing period of 4-6 months is necessary for the graft to integrate before one proceeds with implant placement. Though average bone gain with the autogenous graft is dictated by the anatomy of the donor site, a weighted mean gain of 4.25 mm was shown in a meta-analysis by Sanz et al.33

Figure 3.

Additive Techniques - Figure 4

A. Class 4 defect in #12,13 site.

Additive Techniques - Figure 5

B. Recipient site - after flap elevation.

Additive Techniques - Figure 6

C. Donor site - mandibular ramus.

Additive Techniques - Figure 7

D. Ramus block graft harvested.

Figure 3.

Additive Techniques - Figure 8

E. Autogenous block graft fixated to the recipient bed with screws.

Additive Techniques - Figure 9

F. Re-entry at 5 months, screws removed, implant osteotomy done.

Allogenic and xenogenic block grafts have been proposed as an alternative to autogenous block grafts to reduce patient morbidity. Compared to autogenous block grafts, allogenic block grafts result in less vital bone, more graft resorption, and greater peri-implant marginal bone loss following 1-2 years of loading.35 Although allogenic block grafts have demonstrated a horizontal gain ranging from 3-6mm, longer-term studies and studies that are more robust are necessary to determine if it is a comparable or superior option.36 Scientific evidence for block xenografts is limited and caution should be used when considering this as a treatment option.36